Minimal Weierstrass equation
Minimal Weierstrass equation
Simplified equation
\(y^2=x^3-10668x+384208\) | (homogenize, simplify) |
\(y^2z=x^3-10668xz^2+384208z^3\) | (dehomogenize, simplify) |
\(y^2=x^3-10668x+384208\) | (homogenize, minimize) |
Mordell-Weil group structure
\(\Z \oplus \Z/{2}\Z \oplus \Z/{2}\Z\)
Mordell-Weil generators
$P$ | $\hat{h}(P)$ | Order |
---|---|---|
$(29, 315)$ | $2.5083728486021602016022585990$ | $\infty$ |
$(44, 0)$ | $0$ | $2$ |
$(74, 0)$ | $0$ | $2$ |
Integral points
\( \left(-118, 0\right) \), \((-54,\pm 896)\), \((29,\pm 315)\), \( \left(44, 0\right) \), \( \left(74, 0\right) \), \((368,\pm 6804)\)
Invariants
Conductor: | $N$ | = | \( 2880 \) | = | $2^{6} \cdot 3^{2} \cdot 5$ | comment: Conductor
sage: E.conductor().factor()
gp: ellglobalred(E)[1]
magma: Conductor(E);
oscar: conductor(E)
|
Discriminant: | $\Delta$ | = | $13931406950400$ | = | $2^{20} \cdot 3^{12} \cdot 5^{2} $ | comment: Discriminant
sage: E.discriminant().factor()
gp: E.disc
magma: Discriminant(E);
oscar: discriminant(E)
|
j-invariant: | $j$ | = | \( \frac{702595369}{72900} \) | = | $2^{-2} \cdot 3^{-6} \cdot 5^{-2} \cdot 7^{3} \cdot 127^{3}$ | comment: j-invariant
sage: E.j_invariant().factor()
gp: E.j
magma: jInvariant(E);
oscar: j_invariant(E)
|
Endomorphism ring: | $\mathrm{End}(E)$ | = | $\Z$ | |||
Geometric endomorphism ring: | $\mathrm{End}(E_{\overline{\Q}})$ | = | \(\Z\) (no potential complex multiplication) | sage: E.has_cm()
magma: HasComplexMultiplication(E);
|
||
Sato-Tate group: | $\mathrm{ST}(E)$ | = | $\mathrm{SU}(2)$ | |||
Faltings height: | $h_{\mathrm{Faltings}}$ | ≈ | $1.2573131657762969897064744430$ | gp: ellheight(E)
magma: FaltingsHeight(E);
oscar: faltings_height(E)
|
||
Stable Faltings height: | $h_{\mathrm{stable}}$ | ≈ | $-0.33171374939767582011699635765$ | magma: StableFaltingsHeight(E);
oscar: stable_faltings_height(E)
|
||
$abc$ quality: | $Q$ | ≈ | $1.0045688963827404$ | |||
Szpiro ratio: | $\sigma_{m}$ | ≈ | $4.951150467541965$ |
BSD invariants
Analytic rank: | $r_{\mathrm{an}}$ | = | $ 1$ | sage: E.analytic_rank()
gp: ellanalyticrank(E)
magma: AnalyticRank(E);
|
Mordell-Weil rank: | $r$ | = | $ 1$ | comment: Rank
sage: E.rank()
gp: [lower,upper] = ellrank(E)
magma: Rank(E);
|
Regulator: | $\mathrm{Reg}(E/\Q)$ | ≈ | $2.5083728486021602016022585990$ | comment: Regulator
sage: E.regulator()
G = E.gen \\ if available
magma: Regulator(E);
|
Real period: | $\Omega$ | ≈ | $0.68421357327933122638177570808$ | comment: Real Period
sage: E.period_lattice().omega()
gp: if(E.disc>0,2,1)*E.omega[1]
magma: (Discriminant(E) gt 0 select 2 else 1) * RealPeriod(E);
|
Tamagawa product: | $\prod_{p}c_p$ | = | $ 32 $ = $ 2^{2}\cdot2^{2}\cdot2 $ | comment: Tamagawa numbers
sage: E.tamagawa_numbers()
gp: gr=ellglobalred(E); [[gr[4][i,1],gr[5][i][4]] | i<-[1..#gr[4][,1]]]
magma: TamagawaNumbers(E);
oscar: tamagawa_numbers(E)
|
Torsion order: | $\#E(\Q)_{\mathrm{tor}}$ | = | $4$ | comment: Torsion order
sage: E.torsion_order()
gp: elltors(E)[1]
magma: Order(TorsionSubgroup(E));
oscar: prod(torsion_structure(E)[1])
|
Special value: | $ L'(E,1)$ | ≈ | $3.4325254997178779021589425933 $ | comment: Special L-value
r = E.rank();
gp: [r,L1r] = ellanalyticrank(E); L1r/r!
magma: Lr1 where r,Lr1 := AnalyticRank(E: Precision:=12);
|
Analytic order of Ш: | Ш${}_{\mathrm{an}}$ | ≈ | $1$ (rounded) | comment: Order of Sha
sage: E.sha().an_numerical()
magma: MordellWeilShaInformation(E);
|
BSD formula
$\displaystyle 3.432525500 \approx L'(E,1) = \frac{\# Ш(E/\Q)\cdot \Omega_E \cdot \mathrm{Reg}(E/\Q) \cdot \prod_p c_p}{\#E(\Q)_{\rm tor}^2} \approx \frac{1 \cdot 0.684214 \cdot 2.508373 \cdot 32}{4^2} \approx 3.432525500$
Modular invariants
For more coefficients, see the Downloads section to the right.
Modular degree: | 6144 | comment: Modular degree
sage: E.modular_degree()
gp: ellmoddegree(E)
magma: ModularDegree(E);
|
$ \Gamma_0(N) $-optimal: | no | |
Manin constant: | 1 | comment: Manin constant
magma: ManinConstant(E);
|
Local data at primes of bad reduction
This elliptic curve is not semistable. There are 3 primes $p$ of bad reduction:
$p$ | Tamagawa number | Kodaira symbol | Reduction type | Root number | $\mathrm{ord}_p(N)$ | $\mathrm{ord}_p(\Delta)$ | $\mathrm{ord}_p(\mathrm{den}(j))$ |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
$2$ | $4$ | $I_{10}^{*}$ | additive | -1 | 6 | 20 | 2 |
$3$ | $4$ | $I_{6}^{*}$ | additive | -1 | 2 | 12 | 6 |
$5$ | $2$ | $I_{2}$ | nonsplit multiplicative | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 |
Galois representations
The $\ell$-adic Galois representation has maximal image for all primes $\ell$ except those listed in the table below.
prime $\ell$ | mod-$\ell$ image | $\ell$-adic image |
---|---|---|
$2$ | 2Cs | 8.12.0.1 |
$3$ | 3B | 3.4.0.1 |
The image $H:=\rho_E(\Gal(\overline{\Q}/\Q))$ of the adelic Galois representation has level \( 120 = 2^{3} \cdot 3 \cdot 5 \), index $384$, genus $5$, and generators
$\left(\begin{array}{rr} 89 & 108 \\ 54 & 47 \end{array}\right),\left(\begin{array}{rr} 39 & 116 \\ 98 & 111 \end{array}\right),\left(\begin{array}{rr} 109 & 12 \\ 108 & 13 \end{array}\right),\left(\begin{array}{rr} 97 & 6 \\ 0 & 1 \end{array}\right),\left(\begin{array}{rr} 9 & 4 \\ 104 & 113 \end{array}\right),\left(\begin{array}{rr} 1 & 0 \\ 12 & 1 \end{array}\right),\left(\begin{array}{rr} 1 & 12 \\ 0 & 1 \end{array}\right),\left(\begin{array}{rr} 53 & 114 \\ 6 & 5 \end{array}\right)$.
The torsion field $K:=\Q(E[120])$ is a degree-$92160$ Galois extension of $\Q$ with $\Gal(K/\Q)$ isomorphic to the projection of $H$ to $\GL_2(\Z/120\Z)$.
The table below list all primes $\ell$ for which the Serre invariants associated to the mod-$\ell$ Galois representation are exceptional.
$\ell$ | Reduction type | Serre weight | Serre conductor |
---|---|---|---|
$2$ | additive | $2$ | \( 9 = 3^{2} \) |
$3$ | additive | $2$ | \( 320 = 2^{6} \cdot 5 \) |
$5$ | nonsplit multiplicative | $6$ | \( 576 = 2^{6} \cdot 3^{2} \) |
Isogenies
This curve has non-trivial cyclic isogenies of degree $d$ for $d=$
2, 3 and 6.
Its isogeny class 2880bb
consists of 8 curves linked by isogenies of
degrees dividing 12.
Twists
The minimal quadratic twist of this elliptic curve is 30a2, its twist by $24$.
Growth of torsion in number fields
The number fields $K$ of degree less than 24 such that $E(K)_{\rm tors}$ is strictly larger than $E(\Q)_{\rm tors}$ $\cong \Z/{2}\Z \oplus \Z/{2}\Z$ are as follows:
$[K:\Q]$ | $K$ | $E(K)_{\rm tors}$ | Base change curve |
---|---|---|---|
$2$ | \(\Q(\sqrt{6}) \) | \(\Z/2\Z \oplus \Z/6\Z\) | 2.2.24.1-150.1-e7 |
$4$ | \(\Q(\sqrt{3}, \sqrt{10})\) | \(\Z/2\Z \oplus \Z/4\Z\) | not in database |
$4$ | \(\Q(\sqrt{2}, \sqrt{-15})\) | \(\Z/2\Z \oplus \Z/4\Z\) | not in database |
$4$ | \(\Q(\sqrt{-2}, \sqrt{-3})\) | \(\Z/2\Z \oplus \Z/12\Z\) | not in database |
$6$ | 6.0.11520000.1 | \(\Z/2\Z \oplus \Z/6\Z\) | not in database |
$8$ | 8.8.3317760000.1 | \(\Z/2\Z \oplus \Z/12\Z\) | not in database |
$8$ | 8.0.3317760000.6 | \(\Z/2\Z \oplus \Z/12\Z\) | not in database |
$12$ | 12.0.1194393600000000.1 | \(\Z/6\Z \oplus \Z/12\Z\) | not in database |
$16$ | 16.0.11007531417600000000.1 | \(\Z/4\Z \oplus \Z/12\Z\) | not in database |
$16$ | deg 16 | \(\Z/2\Z \oplus \Z/8\Z\) | not in database |
$16$ | deg 16 | \(\Z/2\Z \oplus \Z/8\Z\) | not in database |
$16$ | deg 16 | \(\Z/2\Z \oplus \Z/24\Z\) | not in database |
$18$ | 18.6.4663277994109219268198400000000.1 | \(\Z/2\Z \oplus \Z/18\Z\) | not in database |
We only show fields where the torsion growth is primitive. For fields not in the database, click on the degree shown to reveal the defining polynomial.
Iwasawa invariants
$p$ | 2 | 3 | 5 | 7 | 11 | 13 | 17 | 19 | 23 | 29 | 31 | 37 | 41 | 43 | 47 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Reduction type | add | add | nonsplit | ord | ss | ord | ord | ord | ss | ord | ord | ord | ord | ord | ss |
$\lambda$-invariant(s) | - | - | 1 | 1 | 1,1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1,1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1,1 |
$\mu$-invariant(s) | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0,0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0,0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0,0 |
An entry - indicates that the invariants are not computed because the reduction is additive.
$p$-adic regulators
$p$-adic regulators are not yet computed for curves that are not $\Gamma_0$-optimal.